<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Life of a Law Student &#187; Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/category/2l3l/evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com</link>
	<description>The Life of a Law Student project chronicles the material presented to and learned by law students across the country and around the world. The project was created by Neil Wehneman, an incoming transfer student at Indiana University at Indianapolis and led by Rob Wiltbank, a Criminal Justice undergrad at Delaware Tech and the University of Delaware. Feeds are segmented by course.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team </copyright>
		<managingEditor>rob@lifeofalawstudent.com (Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>rob@lifeofalawstudent.com(Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team)</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>law school, law student, legal, law, court, school, constitution, criminal</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>To make as much legal knowledge and information freely available, to as many people, in as many ways, as is possiblehellip;</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The Life of a Law Student project chronicles the material presented to and learned by law students across the country and around the world. The project was created by Neil Wehneman, an incoming transfer student at Indiana University at Indianapolis and led by Rob Wiltbank, a Criminal Justice undergrad at Delaware Tech and the University of Delaware. Feeds are segmented by course.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="Higher Education"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="Education Technology"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations">
  <itunes:category text="National"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>rob@lifeofalawstudent.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/images/podcast.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Evidence 10: Authentication and Original Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-10-authentication-and-original-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-10-authentication-and-original-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our final episode of our Evidence series, we talk about the 900 and 1000 rules on Authentication and the Original Writing requirement.
Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification
Rule 902. Self-authentication
Rule 903. Subscribing Witness&#8217; Testimony Unnecessary
Rule 1001. Definitions
Rule 1002. Requirement of Original
Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates
Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents
Rule 1005. Public Records
Rule [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our final episode of our Evidence series, we talk about the 900 and 1000 rules on <span>Authentication and the Original Writing requirement.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule901">Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule902">Rule 902. Self-authentication<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule903">Rule 903. Subscribing Witness&#8217; Testimony Unnecessary</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule903"></a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1001">Rule 1001. Definitions<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1002">Rule 1002. Requirement of Original<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1003">Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1004">Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1005">Rule 1005. Public Records<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1006">Rule 1006. Summaries<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1007">Rule 1007. Testimony or Written Admission of Party<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule1008">Rule 1008. Functions of Court and Jury</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-10-authentication-and-original-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence10.mp3" length="16300427" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>16:57</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In our final episode of our Evidence series, we talk about the 900 and 1000 rules onnbsp;Authentication and the Original Writing requirement.

Rule 901. Requirement of ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In our final episode of our Evidence series, we talk about the 900 and 1000 rules onnbsp;Authentication and the Original Writing requirement.

Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification
Rule 902. Self-authentication
Rule 903. Subscribing Witness' Testimony Unnecessary

Rule 1001. Definitions
Rule 1002. Requirement of Original
Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates
Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents
Rule 1005. Public Records
Rule 1006. Summaries
Rule 1007. Testimony or Written Admission of Party
Rule 1008. Functions of Court and Jury</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #9: Presumptions</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-9-presumptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-9-presumptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode of Life of a Law Student, we&#8217;ll be discussion Presumptions.
Rule 301. Presumptions in General Civil Actions and Proceedings
Rule 302. Applicability of State Law in Civil Actions and Proceedings
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Life of a Law Student, we&#8217;ll be discussion Presumptions.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule301">Rule 301. Presumptions in General Civil Actions and Proceedings<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule302">Rule 302. Applicability of State Law in Civil Actions and Proceedings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-9-presumptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence9.mp3" length="13329155" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>13:51</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Life of a Law Student, we'll be discussion Presumptions.

Rule 301. Presumptions in General Civil Actions and Proceedings
Rule 302. Applicability of State ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode of Life of a Law Student, we'll be discussion Presumptions.

Rule 301. Presumptions in General Civil Actions and Proceedings
Rule 302. Applicability of State Law in Civil Actions and Proceedings</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #8: Lay and Expert Witnesses</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-8-lay-and-expert-witnesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-8-lay-and-expert-witnesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Evidence, episode 8, we&#8217;re talking about who can testify and how the testimony must occur.
Rule 602. Lack of Personal Knowledge
Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses
Rule 702. Testimony by Experts
Rule 703. Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts
Rule 704. Opinion on Ultimate Issue
Rule 705. Disclosure of Facts or Data Underlying Expert Opinion
Rule 706. Court Appointed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Evidence, episode 8, we&#8217;re talking about who can testify and how the testimony must occur.</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule602">Rule 602. Lack of Personal Knowledge</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule701">Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses</a><br />
<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule702">Rule 702. Testimony by Experts<br />
</a></span><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule703">Rule 703. Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule704">Rule 704. Opinion on Ultimate Issue<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule705">Rule 705. Disclosure of Facts or Data Underlying Expert Opinion<br />
</a><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule706">Rule 706. Court Appointed Experts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/04/26/evidence-8-lay-and-expert-witnesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence8.mp3" length="28049259" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>29:11</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In Evidence, episode 8, we're talking about who can testify and how the testimony must occur.

Rule 602. Lack of Personal Knowledge

Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In Evidence, episode 8, we're talking about who can testify and how the testimony must occur.

Rule 602. Lack of Personal Knowledge

Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses
Rule 702. Testimony by Experts
Rule 703. Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts
Rule 704. Opinion on Ultimate Issue
Rule 705. Disclosure of Facts or Data Underlying Expert Opinion
Rule 706. Court Appointed Experts</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #7: Character Evidence II</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/06/evidence-7-character-evidence-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/06/evidence-7-character-evidence-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve continues his podcast on character evidence, discussing the Federal Rules of Evidence covering credibility, character and impeachment.
Rule 608. Evidence of Character and Conduct of Witness
Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve continues his podcast on character evidence, discussing the Federal Rules of Evidence covering credibility, character and impeachment.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule608" target="_blank">Rule 608. Evidence of Character and Conduct of Witness</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule609" target="_blank">Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/06/evidence-7-character-evidence-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence7.mp3" length="36757463" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>38:15</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Steve continues his podcast on character evidence, discussing the Federal Rules of Evidence covering credibility, character and impeachment.

Rule 608. Evidence of Character and Conduct of ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Steve continues his podcast on character evidence, discussing the Federal Rules of Evidence covering credibility, character and impeachment.

Rule 608. Evidence of Character and Conduct of Witness

Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #6: Character Evidence I</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/06/evidence-6-character-evidence-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/06/evidence-6-character-evidence-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode of Evidence, Steve Wasick presents the first of a two part series on character evidence, covering Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and 405.
Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible To Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes
Rule 405. Methods of Proving Character
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Evidence, Steve Wasick presents the first of a two part series on character evidence, covering Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and 405.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule404" target="_blank">Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible To Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule405" target="_blank">Rule 405. Methods of Proving Character</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/06/evidence-6-character-evidence-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence6.mp3" length="31415501" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>32:41</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Evidence, Steve Wasick presents the first of a two part series on character evidence, covering Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode of Evidence, Steve Wasick presents the first of a two part series on character evidence, covering Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and 405.

Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible To Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes

Rule 405. Methods of Proving Character</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #5: Hearsay Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-5-hearsay-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-5-hearsay-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Evidence #5, Steve Wasick talks about unavailable declarants, the residual hearsay exception and the confrontation clause.
Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable
Rule 807. Residual Exception
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Evidence #5, Steve Wasick talks about unavailable declarants, the residual hearsay exception and the confrontation clause.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule804" target="_blank">Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule807" target="_blank">Rule 807. Residual Exception</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-5-hearsay-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence5.mp3" length="28338067" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>29:29</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In Evidence #5, Steve Wasick talks about unavailable declarants, the residual hearsay exception and the confrontation clause.

Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable

Rule 807. Residual Exception </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In Evidence #5, Steve Wasick talks about unavailable declarants, the residual hearsay exception and the confrontation clause.

Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable

Rule 807. Residual Exception</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #4: Admissible Statements and Hearsay Exceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-4-admissible-statements-and-hearsay-exceptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-4-admissible-statements-and-hearsay-exceptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Evidence #4, Steve Wasick covers statements that are not hearsay under Rule 801(d) and hearsay statements that are admissible under the exceptions of Rule 803.
Rule 801. Definitions
Rule 803. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Evidence #4, Steve Wasick covers statements that are not hearsay under Rule 801(d) and hearsay statements that are admissible under the exceptions of Rule 803.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule801" target="_blank">Rule 801. Definitions</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule803" target="_blank">Rule 803. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-4-admissible-statements-and-hearsay-exceptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence4.mp3" length="44722485" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>46:33</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In Evidence #4, Steve Wasick covers statements that are not hearsay under Rule 801(d) and hearsay statements that are admissible under the exceptions of Rule ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In Evidence #4, Steve Wasick covers statements that are not hearsay under Rule 801(d) and hearsay statements that are admissible under the exceptions of Rule 803.

Rule 801. Definitions

Rule 803. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #3: Introduction to Hearsay</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-3-introduction-to-hearsay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-3-introduction-to-hearsay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode of Life of a Law Student, Steve Wasick talks about the basics of hearsay under the Federal Ruleof Evidence 801.
Rule 801. Definitions
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Life of a Law Student, Steve Wasick talks about the basics of hearsay under the Federal Ruleof Evidence 801.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule801">Rule 801. Definitions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/05/evidence-3-introduction-to-hearsay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence3.mp3" length="29072003" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>30:15</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Life of a Law Student, Steve Wasick talks about the basics of hearsay under the Federal Ruleof Evidence 801.

Rule 801. Definitions </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode of Life of a Law Student, Steve Wasick talks about the basics of hearsay under the Federal Ruleof Evidence 801.

Rule 801. Definitions</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #2: Admissibility</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/03/evidence-2-admissibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/03/evidence-2-admissibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve has sent me a good-sized round of podcasts on Evidence &#8212; I&#8217;m currently working on getting them setup for publishing, but we hope to have them all out in time for midterms.
In Episode #2 of Evidence, Steve covers Federal Rules of Evidence 407-411 which touch on exclusions of evidence that, despite being relevant, isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve has sent me a good-sized round of podcasts on Evidence &#8212; I&#8217;m currently working on getting them setup for publishing, but we hope to have them all out in time for midterms.</p>
<p>In Episode #2 of Evidence, Steve covers Federal Rules of Evidence 407-411 which touch on exclusions of evidence that, despite being relevant, isn&#8217;t admissible.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule407" target="_blank">Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule408" target="_blank">Rule 408. Compromise and Offers to Compromise</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule409" target="_blank">Rule 409. Payment of Medical and Similar Expenses</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule410" target="_blank">Rule 410. Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule411" target="_blank">Rule 411. Liability Insurance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/03/03/evidence-2-admissibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence2.mp3" length="25767618" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>26:48</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Steve has sent me a good-sized round of podcasts on Evidence -- I'm currently working on getting them setup for publishing, but we hope to ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Steve has sent me a good-sized round of podcasts on Evidence -- I'm currently working on getting them setup for publishing, but we hope to have them all out in time for midterms.

In Episode #2 of Evidence, Steve covers Federal Rules of Evidence 407-411 which touch on exclusions of evidence that, despite being relevant, isn't admissible.

Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures

Rule 408. Compromise and Offers to Compromise

Rule 409. Payment of Medical and Similar Expenses

Rule 410. Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements

Rule 411. Liability Insurance</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence #1: Relevence</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/02/20/evidence-1-relevence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/02/20/evidence-1-relevence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wiltbank</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2L/3L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wasick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d like to start off by welcoming Steve Wasick to the Life of a Law Student team!
Steve is a 2L at Northwestern University who has taken the time out of his studies to create a new series for us based on his Evidence class.  Thank you, Steve and we appreciate your hard work!
In this, the inaugural [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to start off by welcoming Steve Wasick to the Life of a Law Student team!</p>
<p>Steve is a 2L at Northwestern University who has taken the time out of his studies to create a new series for us based on his Evidence class.  Thank you, Steve and we appreciate your hard work!</p>
<p>In this, the inaugural episode of Evidence, Steve covers Evidence, covering the following:</p>
<p><a title="Rule 401" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule401" target="_blank">Rule 401: Definition of &#8220;Relevant Evidence.&#8221;</a></p>
<p><a title="Rule 402" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule402" target="_blank">Rule 402: Admissibility based on relevance.</a></p>
<p><a title="Rule 104" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule104" target="_blank">Rule 104(b): Conditional relevance.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2011/02/20/evidence-1-relevence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/evidence1.mp3" length="22215336" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>23:06</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>I'd like to start off by welcoming Steve Wasick to the Life of a Law Student team!

Steve is a 2L at Northwestern University who has ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>I'd like to start off by welcoming Steve Wasick to the Life of a Law Student team!

Steve is a 2L at Northwestern University who has taken the time out of his studies to create a new series for us based on his Evidence class. nbsp;Thank you, Steve and we appreciate your hard work!

In this, thenbsp;inaugural episode of Evidence, Steve covers Evidence, covering the following:

Rule 401: Definition of "Relevant Evidence."

Rule 402: Admissibility based on relevance.

Rule 104(b): Conditional relevance.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>2L/3L,,Evidence,,Northwestern,University,Law,,Steve,Wasick</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.134 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->

