<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Life of a Law Student &#187; Intro to the Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/category/1l/intro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com</link>
	<description>The Life of a Law Student project chronicles the material presented to and learned by law students across the country and around the world. The project was created by Neil Wehneman, an incoming transfer student at Indiana University at Indianapolis and led by Rob Wiltbank, a Criminal Justice undergrad at Delaware Tech and the University of Delaware. Feeds are segmented by course.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 02:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team </copyright>
		<managingEditor>rob@lifeofalawstudent.com (Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>rob@lifeofalawstudent.com(Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team)</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>law school, law student, legal, law, court, school, constitution, criminal</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>To make as much legal knowledge and information freely available, to as many people, in as many ways, as is possiblehellip;</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The Life of a Law Student project chronicles the material presented to and learned by law students across the country and around the world. The project was created by Neil Wehneman, an incoming transfer student at Indiana University at Indianapolis and led by Rob Wiltbank, a Criminal Justice undergrad at Delaware Tech and the University of Delaware. Feeds are segmented by course.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="Higher Education"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="Education Technology"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations">
  <itunes:category text="National"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>rob@lifeofalawstudent.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/images/podcast.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Intro to the Law #6: Logic and Statutory Interpretation</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/23/intro-to-the-law-6-logic-and-statutory-interpretation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/23/intro-to-the-law-6-logic-and-statutory-interpretation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intro to the Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neil Wehneman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati College of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/wordpress/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode, the final one in Intro to the Law, we examine the role of logic in judiciary opinions, and put forth a handful of frameworks for interpreting the law.  We also look at the Chevron framework and applying that to specific cases.
Hynes v. NY Central Railroad (PDF from Emery&#8217;s law school)
Chevron U.S.A. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, the final one in Intro to the Law, we examine the role of logic in judiciary opinions, and put forth a handful of frameworks for interpreting the law.  We also look at the Chevron framework and applying that to specific cases.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/academics/orientation/lm.orientation2004.pdf"><i>Hynes v. NY Central Railroad</i></a> (PDF from Emery&#8217;s law school)<br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&#038;court=us&#038;vol=467&#038;page=837"><i>Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council</i></a><br />
<A href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&#038;court=US&#038;case=/us/500/173.html"><i>Rust v. Sullivan</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=499&#038;invol=244"><i>EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co.</i></a></p>
<p>I will link in <i>Caminetti</i>, <i>Kirby</i>, and <i>Holy Trinity Church</i> once I can find copies of those cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/23/intro-to-the-law-6-logic-and-statutory-interpretation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/intro6.mp3" length="9579780" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:01:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode, the final one in Intro to the Law, we examine the role of logic in judiciary opinions, and put forth a handful ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode, the final one in Intro to the Law, we examine the role of logic in judiciary opinions, and put forth a handful of frameworks for interpreting the law.  We also look at the Chevron framework and applying that to specific cases.

Hynes v. NY Central Railroad (PDF from Emery's law school)
Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council
Rust v. Sullivan
EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co.

I will link in Caminetti, Kirby, and Holy Trinity Church once I can find copies of those cases.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>1L,,Intro,to,the,Law,,Neil,Wehneman,,University,of,Cincinnati,College,of,Law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro to the Law #5: Ratio Decidendi and NY Product Liability</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/20/intro-to-the-law-5-ratio-decidendi-and-ny-product-liability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/20/intro-to-the-law-5-ratio-decidendi-and-ny-product-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intro to the Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neil Wehneman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati College of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/wordpress/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode we define ratio decidendi, compare it to stare decisis, and use these frameworks to track the evolution of New York product liability law.
Langridge v. Levy
Winterbottom v. Wright
Thomas v. Winchester
Loop v. Litchfield
Losee v. Clute
Devlin v. Smith
Statler v. Ray
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company
Wikipedia entry on Justice Benjamin Cardozo
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we define ratio decidendi, compare it to stare decisis, and use these frameworks to track the evolution of New York product liability law.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Lngrg_Levy.html"><i>Langridge v. Levy</i></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Wntbtm_Wr.html"><i>Winterbottom v. Wright</i></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Thomas_Winc.html"><i>Thomas v. Winchester</i></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/LOOP_LITCH.HTML"><i>Loop v. Litchfield</i></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Losee_Clute.html"><i>Losee v. Clute</i></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Devlin_v_Smith.html"><i>Devlin v. Smith</i><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Statler_Ray.html"><i>Statler v. Ray</i><br />
<a href="http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/MacPhrsn_Bu.html"><i>MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company</i><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Cardozo<br />
">Wikipedia entry on Justice Benjamin Cardozo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/20/intro-to-the-law-5-ratio-decidendi-and-ny-product-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/intro5.mp3" length="32142570" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>33:25</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode we define ratio decidendi, compare it to stare decisis, and use these frameworks to track the evolution of New York product liability ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode we define ratio decidendi, compare it to stare decisis, and use these frameworks to track the evolution of New York product liability law.

Langridge v. Levy
Winterbottom v. Wright
Thomas v. Winchester
Loop v. Litchfield
Losee v. Clute
Devlin v. Smith
Statler v. Ray
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company
Wikipedia entry on Justice Benjamin Cardozo</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>1L,,Intro,to,the,Law,,Neil,Wehneman,,University,of,Cincinnati,College,of,Law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro to the Law #4: Stare Decisis</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/18/intro-to-the-law-4-stare-decisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/18/intro-to-the-law-4-stare-decisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intro to the Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neil Wehneman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati College of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/wordpress/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode we briefly examine the four primary sources of law, and spend the balance of the time discussing Stare Decisis.  Cases involving death penalty sentencing, police confessions, and anti-sodomy laws are used as examples.  Finally, we consider the question of judicial philosophy vs. political philosophy.
Note: when I mention Casey considering reliance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we briefly examine the four primary sources of law, and spend the balance of the time discussing Stare Decisis.  Cases involving death penalty sentencing, police confessions, and anti-sodomy laws are used as examples.  Finally, we consider the question of judicial philosophy vs. political philosophy.</p>
<p>Note: when I mention Casey considering reliance in regards to contraception, I actually meant reliance on access to abortion in the event contraception failed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/psylawseminar/Rowland.htm"><i>Rowland v. Christian</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&#038;court=us&#038;vol=482&#038;invol=496"><i>Booth v. Maryland</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=490&#038;invol=805"><i>South Carolina v. Gathers</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&#038;court=US&#038;case=/us/501/808.html"><i>Payne v. Tennessee</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=384&#038;invol=436"><i>Miranda v. Arizona</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=99-5525"><i>Dickerson v. United States</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=478&#038;invol=186"><i>Bowers v. Hardwick</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=505&#038;invol=833"><i>Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=U10179"><i>Romer v. Evans</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=02-102"><i>Lawrence v. Texas</i></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/18/intro-to-the-law-4-stare-decisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/intro4.mp3" length="33276370" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>34:36</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode we briefly examine the four primary sources of law, and spend the balance of the time discussing Stare Decisis.  Cases involving ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode we briefly examine the four primary sources of law, and spend the balance of the time discussing Stare Decisis.  Cases involving death penalty sentencing, police confessions, and anti-sodomy laws are used as examples.  Finally, we consider the question of judicial philosophy vs. political philosophy.

Note: when I mention Casey considering reliance in regards to contraception, I actually meant reliance on access to abortion in the event contraception failed.

Rowland v. Christian
Booth v. Maryland
South Carolina v. Gathers
Payne v. Tennessee
Miranda v. Arizona
Dickerson v. United States
Bowers v. Hardwick
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Romer v. Evans
Lawrence v. Texas</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>1L,,Intro,to,the,Law,,Neil,Wehneman,,University,of,Cincinnati,College,of,Law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro to the Law #3: Separation of Powers, Court Systems, and Jury Nullification</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/17/intro-to-the-law-3-separation-of-powers-court-systems-and-jury-nullification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/17/intro-to-the-law-3-separation-of-powers-court-systems-and-jury-nullification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intro to the Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neil Wehneman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati College of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/wordpress/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode we examine the separation of powers, how Congress is able to regulate (or not regulate) the States, how the state and federal courts are constructed, and examine the issue of jury nullification (intentionally letting a guilty party go free at trial).
Note: I believe I gave an erroneous date on the Articles of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we examine the separation of powers, how Congress is able to regulate (or not regulate) the States, how the state and federal courts are constructed, and examine the issue of jury nullification (intentionally letting a guilty party go free at trial).</p>
<p>Note: I believe I gave an erroneous date on the Articles of Confederation being created.  They were adopted in 1781.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/articles.html">The Articles of Confederation</a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=U10298"><i>Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=volpage&#038;court=us&#038;vol=501&#038;page=374"><i>Lampf v. Gilbertson</i></A><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;navby=case&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=99-224"><i>Miller v. French</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=01-1368"><i>Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs</i></A><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=03-1454"><i>Gonzales v. Raich</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=U10287"><i>United States v. Lopez</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=000&#038;invol=99-5"><i>United States v. Morrison</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=317&#038;invol=111"><i>Wickard v. Filburn</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=156&#038;invol=51"><i>Sparf v. US</i></a> (1895 jury nullification case)</p>
<p>Unfortunately I was unable to find copies of the jury nullification papers on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/17/intro-to-the-law-3-separation-of-powers-court-systems-and-jury-nullification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/intro3.mp3" length="38328504" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>41:33</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode we examine the separation of powers, how Congress is able to regulate (or not regulate) the States, how the state and federal ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode we examine the separation of powers, how Congress is able to regulate (or not regulate) the States, how the state and federal courts are constructed, and examine the issue of jury nullification (intentionally letting a guilty party go free at trial).

Note: I believe I gave an erroneous date on the Articles of Confederation being created.  They were adopted in 1781.

The Articles of Confederation
Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
Lampf v. Gilbertson
Miller v. French
Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Gonzales v. Raich
United States v. Lopez
United States v. Morrison
Wickard v. Filburn
Sparf v. US (1895 jury nullification case)

Unfortunately I was unable to find copies of the jury nullification papers on the Internet.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>1L,,Intro,to,the,Law,,Neil,Wehneman,,University,of,Cincinnati,College,of,Law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro to the Law #2: Speluncean Redux and Legal Power Struggles</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/16/intro-to-the-law-2-speluncean-redux-and-legal-power-struggles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/16/intro-to-the-law-2-speluncean-redux-and-legal-power-struggles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intro to the Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neil Wehneman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati College of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/wordpress/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode we take a quick second look at the Spelucean Explorers case, and consider the law as a set of power struggles between institutions and individuals.
Rules and Standards for Cyberspace (for those interested in Rules and Standards)
Don&#8217;t Think of an Elephant
Standards for Fair Use
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we take a quick second look at the Spelucean Explorers case, and consider the law as a set of power struggles between institutions and individuals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.elee.cc/RulesandStandards.pdf"><i>Rules and Standards for Cyberspace</i></a> (for those interested in Rules and Standards)<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1931498717/qid=1124185547/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-9559979-4019250?v=glance&#038;s=books&#038;n=507846"><i>Don&#8217;t Think of an Elephant</i><a><br />
<A href="http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107">Standards for Fair Use</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/16/intro-to-the-law-2-speluncean-redux-and-legal-power-struggles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/intro2.mp3" length="18603212" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>19:19</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode we take a quick second look at the Spelucean Explorers case, and consider the law as a set of power struggles between ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode we take a quick second look at the Spelucean Explorers case, and consider the law as a set of power struggles between institutions and individuals.

Rules and Standards for Cyberspace (for those interested in Rules and Standards)
Don't Think of an Elephant
Standards for Fair Use</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>1L,,Intro,to,the,Law,,Neil,Wehneman,,University,of,Cincinnati,College,of,Law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro to the Law #1: Theory of the Law, The Case of the Speluncean Explorers</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/11/intro-to-the-law-1-theory-of-the-law-the-case-of-the-speluncean-explorers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/11/intro-to-the-law-1-theory-of-the-law-the-case-of-the-speluncean-explorers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1L]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intro to the Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neil Wehneman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati College of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/wordpress/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first episode of my Introduction to the Law class.  I quickly look at general theories of the law, and spend the balance of the time examining The Case of the Speluncean Explorers.  Topics touched on include the role and influences of the judiciary, a question of self-defense, the death penalty, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first episode of my Introduction to the Law class.  I quickly look at general theories of the law, and spend the balance of the time examining The Case of the Speluncean Explorers.  Topics touched on include the role and influences of the judiciary, a question of self-defense, the death penalty, and assumptions implicit in law.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nullapoena.de/stud/explorers.html ">The Case of the Speluncean Explorers</A><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=277&#038;invol=438"><i>Olmstead v. U.S.</i></a><br />
<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=389&#038;invol=347"><i>Katz v. United States</i></a><br />
<A href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=41681"><i>Reading the Constitution in Cyberspace</i><br />
<a href="http://www.lessig.org">Prof. Lawrence Lessig</a><br />
<A href="http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org">Information on the death penalty</a><br />
<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/">CrimProf Blog</a> (which carries stories of exonerations and similar)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/2005/08/11/intro-to-the-law-1-theory-of-the-law-the-case-of-the-speluncean-explorers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<enclosure url="http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com/bulkaudio/intro1.mp3" length="10420339" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>34:26</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>This is the first episode of my Introduction to the Law class.  I quickly look at general theories of the law, and spend the ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This is the first episode of my Introduction to the Law class.  I quickly look at general theories of the law, and spend the balance of the time examining The Case of the Speluncean Explorers.  Topics touched on include the role and influences of the judiciary, a question of self-defense, the death penalty, and assumptions implicit in law.

The Case of the Speluncean Explorers
Olmstead v. U.S.
Katz v. United States
Reading the Constitution in Cyberspace
Prof. Lawrence Lessig
Information on the death penalty
CrimProf Blog (which carries stories of exonerations and similar)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>1L,,Intro,to,the,Law,,Neil,Wehneman,,University,of,Cincinnati,College,of,Law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Rob Wiltbank and the LoaLS Team</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.115 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->

