This podcast we will do a brief overview of the Hart-Fuller debate. What happens when two overeducated professors duke it out in the Harvard Law Review? Hart defends the positivist stance that law and morality are separate, while Fuller maintains that law must encompass a certain amount of morality to explain its binding power. My Foundations professor tells me that the consensus across the Atlanic is that Hart won the debate. I’m not sure I see it.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast [24:42m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download